AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1499 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- 723.4x more texture fill rate: 239.8 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1430 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 816 vs 572
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12613 vs 7225
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16433 vs 13720
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16433 vs 13720
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 vs 20 June 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s vs 331.5 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1430 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 vs 572 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 vs 7225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 vs 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 vs 13720 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78322 vs 59733
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6381 vs 3712
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6381 vs 3712
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8915 vs 3353
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8915 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78322 vs 59733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6381 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6381 vs 3712 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8915 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8915 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 816 | 572 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12613 | 7225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 59733 | 78322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16433 | 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16433 | 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 6381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 6381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 8915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 8915 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Navi 10 | GP100 |
| Launch date | 4 Aug 2020 | 20 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 173 | 185 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1499 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 479.7 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.35 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.675 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 95.94 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 239.8 GTexel/s | 331.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 15,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 720.9 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1430 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT with others
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT vs
IntelArc A730M
