AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro 5700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5700

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1075 MHz
1012.5x more texture fill rate: 194.4 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 250 Watt
214.3x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64325 vs 40196
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18549 vs 9834
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18549 vs 9834

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 Aug 2020 vs 17 March 2015
Core clock speed	1243 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz vs 1075 MHz
Texture fill rate	194.4 GTexel/s vs 192 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	64325 vs 40196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18549 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18549 vs 9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3343

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB

Pipelines	3072 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 8 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 5700
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

64325

40196

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18549

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

18549

9834

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3700

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3343

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3343

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 5700	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Geekbench - OpenCL	64325	40196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	18549	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	18549	9834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3343
PassMark - G3D Mark		13048
PassMark - G2D Mark		847
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		157.231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1722.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.245
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.225
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		518.554
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		5223

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 5700	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Navi 10	GM200
Launch date	4 Aug 2020	17 March 2015
Place in performance rating	227	314
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$1,999.99
Value for money (0-100)		7.38
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1075 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1243 MHz	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.44 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.221 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	3072
Pixel fill rate	86.40 GPixel/s
Render output units	64
Texture fill rate	194.4 GTexel/s	192 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	250 Watt
Transistor count	10300 million	8,000 million
CUDA cores		3072
Floating-point performance		6,691 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	350 Watt	600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	6-pin + 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options		4x
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	384.0 GB/s	336.5 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost