AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs AMD Radeon R9 290

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon R9 290 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 947 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 275 Watt
• Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 6800 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 vs 6300
• Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 vs 6300

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290

• Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 151.5 GTexel / s vs 140.8 GTexel / s
• Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 4,849 gflops vs 4,506 gflops
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 vs 34757
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.325 vs 86.154
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1366.314 vs 1090.128
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.034 vs 7.88
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 vs 2814
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 vs 2814

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	34757 102277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.154 89.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1090.128 1366.314
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.88 10.034
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	98.349 98.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	539.686 540.645
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9613 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2814 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9613 6300
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2814 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3354

Compare specifications (specs)