AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs AMD FirePro S10000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and AMD FirePro S10000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 66.6x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 750 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34273 vs 30631
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 vs 7867
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 vs 7867
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3321
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3321
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 12 November 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34273 vs 30631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 vs 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 vs 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3321 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S10000
- 2x more pipelines: 4096 vs 2048
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3621 vs 3458
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3621 vs 3458
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2048 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3621 vs 3458 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3621 vs 3458 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S10000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD FirePro S10000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34273 | 30631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | 7867 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | 3621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3321 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4768 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 502 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 73.836 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.978 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | AMD FirePro S10000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 12 November 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 392 | 435 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 32 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 2x 106.4 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 4,313 million |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 305 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 480 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 384 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |