AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 11799.8x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 11.89 GTexel / s
- 6.4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 215 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 14 May 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 11.89 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 80 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34273 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 660 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 397 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 575X | ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Polaris 20 | R600 |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 14 May 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 392 | 375 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Compute units | 32 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 80 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 11.89 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 720 million |
Core clock speed | 743 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 475.5 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 106.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Memory clock speed | 1656 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |