AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 5837.8x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s
- 4.5x more pipelines: 2304 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37347 vs 9616
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 532
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7540 vs 1938
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 30 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s vs 29.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37347 vs 9616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 532 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 vs 1938 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3666 vs 3643
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3666 vs 3643
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 vs 3643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 vs 3643 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 37347 | 9616 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 532 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 1938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro 580X | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 20 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 347 | 767 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | 29.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 5700 million | 1,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 947.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 72 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |