AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 576
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 576 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 35% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.7x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39423 vs 37191
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3643
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3643
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7877 vs 7540
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 vs 18 March 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39423 vs 37191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3643 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3643 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7877 vs 7540 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37191 | 39423 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3643 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3643 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 | 576 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7540 | 7877 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.955 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1294.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.756 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 91.78 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 569.916 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3598 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 580X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | TU107 |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 30 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 346 | 359 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 345.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 38.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 580X with others
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder X1900
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
ATIRadeon HD 3850 X2
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9800S
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
AMDRadeon Pro 580X vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
