AMD Radeon Pro 580X vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 580X and NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

AMD Radeon Pro 580X

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580X

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1093 MHz
3952.4x more texture fill rate: 172.8 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
3.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 640
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37191 vs 10582
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3643 vs 2645
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3643 vs 2645
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 318
2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7540 vs 3241

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	18 March 2019 vs 11 January 2017
Core clock speed	1100 MHz vs 1093 MHz
Texture fill rate	172.8 GTexel/s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 640
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	37191 vs 10582
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3643 vs 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3643 vs 2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 vs 3359
PassMark - G2D Mark	698 vs 318
PassMark - G3D Mark	7540 vs 3241

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

3.3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 150 Watt
3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt vs 150 Watt
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 580X
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

37191

10582

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3643

2645

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3643

2645

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3360

3359

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

698

318

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7540

3241

Name	AMD Radeon Pro 580X	NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Geekbench - OpenCL	37191	10582
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3643	2645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3643	2645
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360	3359
PassMark - G2D Mark	698	318
PassMark - G3D Mark	7540	3241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		163.204
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4941

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro 580X	NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Code name	Polaris 20	GM107
Launch date	18 March 2019	11 January 2017
Place in performance rating	346	767
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1100 MHz	1093 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	345.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.530 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	5.530 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	640
Pixel fill rate	38.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	172.8 GTexel/s	43.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	150 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	5700 million	1,870 million
Floating-point performance		1,399 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.3
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	217.0 GB/s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1695 MHz (6780 MHz effective)	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)