AMD Radeon Pro SSG vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro SSG and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 3.4x more texture fill rate: 384.0 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1536
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 12,288 gflops vs 3,625 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10972 vs 5936
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 588 vs 391
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11029 vs 9390
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 3683
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11029 vs 9390
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 3683
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 8 August 2017 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops vs 3,625 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10972 vs 5936 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 vs 391 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11029 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11029 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 3683 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1890 MHz
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10972 | 5936 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 | 391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11029 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11029 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro SSG | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Vega 10 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 8 August 2017 | 30 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 158 | 352 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 384.0 GTexel / s | 113.3 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro SSG with others
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
AMDRadeon Pro SSG vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
