AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1920
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 7442
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 7442
  • 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 6714
  • 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 6714
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 vs 7 January 2019
Pipelines 2304 vs 1920
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 16807 vs 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 16807 vs 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 37642 vs 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 37642 vs 6714

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

  • Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
  • Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 525
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14151 vs 12258
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 13220
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 13220
  • Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70668 vs 61570
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1365 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1680 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 160 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 750 vs 525
PassMark - G3D Mark 14151 vs 12258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20094 vs 13220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20094 vs 13220
Geekbench - OpenCL 70668 vs 61570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
525
750
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12258
14151
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13220
20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13220
20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16807
7442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16807
7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37642
6714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37642
6714
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
61570
70668
Name AMD Radeon Pro V520 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark 525 750
PassMark - G3D Mark 12258 14151
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13220 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13220 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 16807 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 16807 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 37642 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 37642 6714
Geekbench - OpenCL 61570 70668
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3131.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 21.852
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 135.923
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1141.283
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7489

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro V520 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Turing
Code name Navi 12 TU106
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 7 January 2019
Place in performance rating 61 150
Type Server Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $349
Price now $349.99
Value for money (0-100) 62.74

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1600 MHz 1680 MHz
Compute units 36
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1365 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.373 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 1920
Pixel fill rate 102.4 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 230.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 160 Watt
Transistor count 10,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
DisplayPort count 2
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches) 229 mm
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin
Width 111 mm (4.4 inches)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 2.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR6