AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 7442
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 7442
- 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 6714
- 5.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 6714
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 7 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 6714 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 41% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 750 vs 525
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14151 vs 12258
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 13220
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 13220
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70668 vs 61570
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1680 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 vs 525 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14151 vs 12258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 vs 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 vs 13220 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70668 vs 61570 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 750 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12258 | 14151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13220 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13220 | 20094 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 | 7442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 | 6714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 | 6714 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61570 | 70668 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.337 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3131.344 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.923 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 12 | TU106 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 7 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 61 | 150 |
Type | Server | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1680 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.373 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 230.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort count | 2 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 229 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |