AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 8898
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 8898
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 8029
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 8029
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 8029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 8029 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 96% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 525
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 vs 12258
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 13220
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 13220
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 525 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 vs 12258 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 13220 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 13220 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 601 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12258 | 12354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13220 | 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13220 | 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 | 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 | 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 | 8029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 | 8029 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61570 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7453 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 12 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 61 | 128 |
| Type | Server | Laptop |
| Price now | $489.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Compute units | 36 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.373 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 230.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro V520 with others
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800 XT
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
NVIDIAA40
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
AMDRadeon Pro V520 vs
NVIDIARTX 3500 Ada Generation
