AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro V520

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 6966
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 6966
6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 6293
6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 6293

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 Dec 2020 vs 20 September 2018
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	16807 vs 6966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	16807 vs 6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	37642 vs 6293
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	37642 vs 6293

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Around 28% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2304
Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 225 Watt
14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 525
Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18815 vs 12258
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 13220
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 13220
Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 vs 61570

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1515 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1710 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Pipelines	2944 vs 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	215 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	912 vs 525
PassMark - G3D Mark	18815 vs 12258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	25500 vs 13220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	25500 vs 13220
Geekbench - OpenCL	102535 vs 61570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

525

912

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12258

18815

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13220

25500

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

13220

25500

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16807

6966

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16807

6966

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37642

6293

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

37642

6293

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

61570

102535

Name	AMD Radeon Pro V520	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G2D Mark	525	912
PassMark - G3D Mark	12258	18815
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	13220	25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	13220	25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	16807	6966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	16807	6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	37642	6293
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	37642	6293
Geekbench - OpenCL	61570	102535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		326.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3938.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		31.684
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		159.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1506.874
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		10966

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro V520	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Turing
Code name	Navi 12	TU104
Launch date	1 Dec 2020	20 September 2018
Place in performance rating	61	98
Type	Server	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$699
Price now		$749.99
Value for money (0-100)		32.34
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1600 MHz	1710 MHz
Compute units	36
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	1515 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	460.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	14.75 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.373 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	2944
Pixel fill rate	102.4 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	230.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	215 Watt
Transistor count		13,600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm (10.5 inches)	267 mm
Recommended system power (PSU)	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	111 mm (4.4 inches)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	2048 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6