AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 230.4 GTexel/s vs 207.4 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 8912
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 8912
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3355
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 230.4 GTexel/s vs 207.4 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 3355 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 583 vs 525
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13789 vs 12258
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 13220
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 13220
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82601 vs 61570
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 583 vs 525 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13789 vs 12258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20344 vs 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20344 vs 13220 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82601 vs 61570 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 583 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12258 | 13789 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13220 | 20344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13220 | 20344 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 | 3355 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61570 | 82601 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8562 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 12 | TU104B |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 2 Apr 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 61 | 136 |
Type | Server | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1080 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) | 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.373 TFLOPS | 6.636 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | 69.12 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 230.4 GTexel/s | 207.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | Dual-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 352.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |