AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
  • Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz
  • Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1080 MHz
  • Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 230.4 GTexel/s vs 207.4 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 8912
  • Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 8912
  • 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3355
  • 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3355
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 vs 2 Apr 2020
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 735 MHz
Boost clock speed 1600 MHz vs 1080 MHz
Texture fill rate 230.4 GTexel/s vs 207.4 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 16807 vs 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 16807 vs 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 37642 vs 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 37642 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 583 vs 525
  • Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13789 vs 12258
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20344 vs 13220
  • Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20344 vs 13220
  • Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82601 vs 61570
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 3072 vs 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 583 vs 525
PassMark - G3D Mark 13789 vs 12258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20344 vs 13220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20344 vs 13220
Geekbench - OpenCL 82601 vs 61570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
525
583
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12258
13789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13220
20344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13220
20344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16807
8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16807
8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37642
3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37642
3355
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
61570
82601
Name AMD Radeon Pro V520 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark 525 583
PassMark - G3D Mark 12258 13789
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13220 20344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13220 20344
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 16807 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 16807 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 37642 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 37642 3355
Geekbench - OpenCL 61570 82601
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8562

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro V520 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Turing
Code name Navi 12 TU104B
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 2 Apr 2020
Place in performance rating 61 136
Type Server Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1600 MHz 1080 MHz
Compute units 36
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 735 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) 207.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) 13.27 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.373 TFLOPS 6.636 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 3072
Pixel fill rate 102.4 GPixel/s 69.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 230.4 GTexel/s 207.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin None
Width 111 mm (4.4 inches) Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 2.2 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 352.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
Memory type HBM2 GDDR6