AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520

  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 3717
  • 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 3717
  • 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3360
  • 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3360
Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 8 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 16807 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 16807 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 37642 vs 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 37642 vs 3360

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

  • Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
  • 2.1x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2304
  • Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 525
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20549 vs 12258
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 13220
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 13220
  • Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107110 vs 61570
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1410 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Boost clock speed 1665 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Texture fill rate 253.1 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
Pipelines 4864 vs 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 996 vs 525
PassMark - G3D Mark 20549 vs 12258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27478 vs 13220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27478 vs 13220
Geekbench - OpenCL 107110 vs 61570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
525
996
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12258
20549
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13220
27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13220
27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16807
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16807
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37642
3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37642
3360
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
61570
107110
Name AMD Radeon Pro V520 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark 525 996
PassMark - G3D Mark 12258 20549
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13220 27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13220 27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 16807 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 16807 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 37642 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 37642 3360
Geekbench - OpenCL 61570 107110
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 311.869
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4657.322
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 35.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1477.456
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 11652

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro V520 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Ampere
Code name Navi 12 GA104
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 1 Dec 2020
Place in performance rating 61 101
Type Server Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $399

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1600 MHz 1665 MHz
Compute units 36
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 1410 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.373 TFLOPS 16.20 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 4864
Pixel fill rate 102.4 GPixel/s 133.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 230.4 GTexel/s 253.1 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches) 242 mm (9.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt 350 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 12-pin
Width 111 mm (4.4 inches) 112 mm (4.4 inches)
Form factor Dual-slot

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.2
OpenCL 2.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Memory type HBM2 GDDR6