AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 3717
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 3717
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 3360
- 11.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 3360
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 vs 3360 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4864 vs 2304
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 525
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20549 vs 12258
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 13220
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 13220
- Around 74% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107110 vs 61570
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 230.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 525 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 vs 12258 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 13220 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 13220 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107110 vs 61570 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 996 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12258 | 20549 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13220 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13220 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 16807 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 16807 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 37642 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 37642 | 3360 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61570 | 107110 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 12 | GA104 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 61 | 101 |
Type | Server | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.373 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 102.4 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 230.4 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | 350 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |