AMD Radeon Pro V520 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro V520 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro V520

  • Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1290 MHz
  • Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 230.4 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
  • Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 16807 vs 11471
  • Around 47% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 16807 vs 11471
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 37642 vs 13334
  • 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 37642 vs 13334
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 780 MHz
Boost clock speed 1600 MHz vs 1290 MHz
Texture fill rate 230.4 GTexel/s vs 206.4 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 8 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 16807 vs 11471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 16807 vs 11471
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 37642 vs 13334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 37642 vs 13334

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
  • 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 525
  • Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15499 vs 12258
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 24877 vs 13220
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 24877 vs 13220
  • Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89617 vs 61570
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 12 Jan 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020
Pipelines 5120 vs 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 650 vs 525
PassMark - G3D Mark 15499 vs 12258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 24877 vs 13220
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 24877 vs 13220
Geekbench - OpenCL 89617 vs 61570

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro V520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
525
650
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12258
15499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13220
24877
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13220
24877
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16807
11471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16807
11471
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37642
13334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
37642
13334
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
61570
89617
Name AMD Radeon Pro V520 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark 525 650
PassMark - G3D Mark 12258 15499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13220 24877
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13220 24877
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 16807 11471
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 16807 11471
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 37642 13334
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 37642 13334
Geekbench - OpenCL 61570 89617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 449.647
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4619.617
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 36.308
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 181.818
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1410.887
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10434

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro V520 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 Ampere
Code name Navi 12 GA104
Launch date 1 Dec 2020 12 Jan 2021
Place in performance rating 61 80
Type Server Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1600 MHz 1290 MHz
Compute units 36
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 780 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 460.8 GFLOPS (1:16) 206.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 14.75 TFLOPS (2:1) 13.21 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.373 TFLOPS 13.21 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 5120
Pixel fill rate 102.4 GPixel/s 103.2 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 230.4 GTexel/s 206.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 80 Watt
Transistor count 17400 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs Portable Device Dependent
DisplayPort support
G-SYNC support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm (10.5 inches)
Recommended system power (PSU) 550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin None
Width 111 mm (4.4 inches)
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.1 12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL 2.2 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 512 GB/s 384.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 2048 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Memory type HBM2 GDDR6

Technologies

GPU Boost
VR Ready