AMD Radeon Pro VII vs AMD FireStream 9370
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro VII and AMD FireStream 9370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro VII
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 6181.8x more texture fill rate: 408 GTexel/s vs 66.0 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1600
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
Launch date | 13 May 2020 vs 23 June 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 408 GTexel/s vs 66.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1600 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9370
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro VII
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9370
Name | AMD Radeon Pro VII | AMD FireStream 9370 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 90077 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2528 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro VII | AMD FireStream 9370 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Cypress |
Launch date | 13 May 2020 | 23 June 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1899 | |
Place in performance rating | 189 | 130 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 825 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 6.528 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.11 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.06 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 1600 |
Pixel fill rate | 108.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 408 GTexel/s | 66.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 2,154 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm (12 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 147.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |