AMD Radeon Pro VII vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro VII and AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro VII
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1700 MHz vs 1677 MHz
- 950.4x more texture fill rate: 408 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Launch date | 13 May 2020 vs 8 August 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz vs 1677 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 408 GTexel/s vs 429.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3840
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 89% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 1406 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3840 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro VII
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid
Name | AMD Radeon Pro VII | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 90077 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7765 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro VII | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 13 May 2020 | 8 August 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1899 | |
Place in performance rating | 189 | 255 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1700 MHz | 1677 MHz |
Compute units | 60 | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1406 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 6.528 TFLOPS (1:2) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 26.11 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.06 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 108.8 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 408 GTexel/s | 429.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | |
Floating-point performance | 13,738 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 305 mm (12 inches) | 267 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Width | 111 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 1024 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz (2 Gbps effective) | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |