AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 8 October 2013 |
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 8870
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 8870
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3586
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3586
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 686 vs 585
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6211 vs 4809
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 vs 3586 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 686 vs 585 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6211 vs 4809 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | 686 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | 6211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Vega 12 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 8 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 360 | 378 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |