AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 14 November 2018 vs 8 October 2013
Boost clock speed 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X

  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 8870
  • Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 8870
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 3586
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 3586
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 686 vs 585
  • Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6211 vs 4809
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9603 vs 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9603 vs 8870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3700 vs 3586
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3700 vs 3586
PassMark - G2D Mark 686 vs 585
PassMark - G3D Mark 6211 vs 4809

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8870
9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8870
9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3586
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3586
3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3357
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
585
686
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
4809
6211
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 AMD Radeon R9 280X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8870 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8870 9603
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3586 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3586 3700
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3357
Geekbench - OpenCL 22421
PassMark - G2D Mark 585 686
PassMark - G3D Mark 4809 6211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 89.187
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1434.496
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.656
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 87.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 493.57
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2346

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 AMD Radeon R9 280X

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Vega 12 Tahiti
Launch date 14 November 2018 8 October 2013
Place in performance rating 360 378
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $299

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1190 MHz 1000 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt
Floating-point performance 4,096 gflops
Pipelines 2048
Stream Processors 2048
Texture fill rate 128.0 GTexel / s
Transistor count 4,313 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 275 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory clock speed 2400 MHz
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 288 GB/s
Memory bus width 384 Bit
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)