AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3316
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 6 February 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3316 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1076 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 8870
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 8870
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3586
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3586
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 22536 vs 22421
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 585
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6936 vs 4809
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1076 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10251 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10251 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3681 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3681 vs 3586 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22536 vs 22421 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 644 vs 585 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6936 vs 4809 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8870 | 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8870 | 10251 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3586 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3586 | 3681 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3316 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 22421 | 22536 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 | 644 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4809 | 6936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 113.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1414.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.736 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 81.206 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 417.823 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Vega 12 | GP106 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 6 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 360 | 394 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $585 | |
Price now | $429.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.44 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1076 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |