AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 925 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5300 vs 4306
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8311 vs 3448
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8311 vs 3448
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 13 November 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 vs 4306 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 vs 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 vs 3448 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 vs 558
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74175 vs 26839
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3347 vs 1663
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3347 vs 1663
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 vs 558 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 vs 26839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 vs 1663 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 1842 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 | 4306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 558 | 567 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 26839 | 74175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 3347 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 1603 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Vega 12 | Curacao |
| Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 13 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 472 | 509 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,368 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
| Texture fill rate | 74 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 210 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960A
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-2Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 5100
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 20 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2200 Mobile
