AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5300 vs 2411
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26818 vs 12495
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8311 vs 5157
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8311 vs 5157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 13 March 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 vs 2411 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26818 vs 12495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 vs 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 vs 5157 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 558
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 1842
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 1663
- 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 1842
- 4.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 1663
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 | 2411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 558 | 631 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26818 | 12495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 7859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 7859 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Vega 12 | GM107 |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 472 | 474 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |