AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 342.9x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26839 vs 25674
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 vs 18 February 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26839 vs 25674 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
- 3x more core clock speed: 889 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9050 vs 5300
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 558
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8721 vs 8311
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1663
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8721 vs 8311
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 1842
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1663
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 889 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9050 vs 5300 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 vs 558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8721 vs 8311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3679 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 1663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8721 vs 8311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3679 vs 1842 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 1663 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5300 | 9050 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 558 | 597 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26839 | 25674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8311 | 8721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1842 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1663 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8311 | 8721 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1842 | 3679 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1663 | 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 3095 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 72.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1293.474 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.988 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 22.384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 290.861 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Vega 12 | GK110B |
Launch date | 14 November 2018 | 18 February 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 472 | 440 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $999.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 10.82 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1190 MHz | 980 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 889 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
CUDA cores | 2880 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,645 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2880 | |
Texture fill rate | 213 billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz | 7.0 GB/s |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 336 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
TXAA |