AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon R9 390
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 1560x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 8936
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53445 vs 44112
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.416 vs 120.267
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 vs 11.097
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 607.381
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 10445
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3708
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3353
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 10445
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3708
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3353
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 8936 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 vs 44112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 vs 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 vs 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 vs 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390
- 45.5x lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 12500 million
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 784
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3164.164 vs 3063.269
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt vs 12500 million |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 vs 784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3164.164 vs 3063.269 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 8936 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 800 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 | 44112 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 120.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 3164.164 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 11.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 607.381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 10445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3353 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 116.473 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3958 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 390 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Greenland | Grenada |
| GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
| Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 228 | 297 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 160.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 275 Watt |
| Compute units | 40 | |
| Floating-point performance | 5,120 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Length | 275 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 512 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
