AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 M390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 2697.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 3597
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 435
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53445 vs 22044
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 135.416 vs 64.199
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 1284.053
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 vs 5.881
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 vs 312.822
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 6508
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 6508
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 vs 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 vs 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 vs 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 vs 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 vs 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 vs 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 6508 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- 166.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 12500 million
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3947
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 10411
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3947
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 10411
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 12500 million |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 10411 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 | 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 24690 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.169 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Greenland | Amethyst |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 303 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 75 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |