AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 2573.643
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3718
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3355
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3718
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3355

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 104.2x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 12500 million
• 15.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12930 vs 11300
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 784
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61407 vs 53445
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 135.416
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 12.678
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 883.876
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 11925
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 11925

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11300 12930
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	784 813
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	53445 61407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	135.416 208.608
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3063.269 2573.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.678 16.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	883.876 926.614
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11925 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3947 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10411 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11925 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3947 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10411 3355

Compare specifications (specs)