AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 727.9x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3063.269 vs 2368.267
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 vs 10841
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3696
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3333
- Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 vs 10841
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3696
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3333
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 vs 2 August 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 342.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 vs 2368.267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 vs 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 vs 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
- 50x lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 12500 million
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- 12.7x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63287 vs 53445
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 165.792 vs 135.416
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.829 vs 12.678
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 992.132 vs 883.876
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 3072 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 12500 million |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63287 vs 53445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 165.792 vs 135.416 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.829 vs 12.678 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 992.132 vs 883.876 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 | 63287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 165.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 2368.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 17.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 992.132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3333 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.354 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9565 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | Pascal |
Code name | Greenland | GP102 |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Launch date | 19 March 2019 | 2 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 344 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,199 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1417 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 342.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 10,974 gflops | |
Transistor count | 11,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 480.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 10008 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5X |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |