AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 5.8x more texture fill rate: 345.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1024
- 5.8x better floating-point performance: 11,059 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71540 vs 70535
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 vs 6316
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 vs 6316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 345.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1024 |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71540 vs 70535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1572 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3709
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3353
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3709
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3353
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1572 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12984 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 805 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71540 | 70535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 142.691 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1729.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.693 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.376 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1396.172 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13339 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13339 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 27566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 27 June 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 227 | 165 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | 1,894 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1024 |
Texture fill rate | 345.6 GTexel / s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 12,500 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |