AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 925 MHz
  • 5.8x more texture fill rate: 345.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1024
  • 5.8x better floating-point performance: 11,059 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71540 vs 70535
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13339 vs 6316
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13339 vs 6316
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 June 2017 vs 13 March 2015
Core clock speed 1250 MHz vs 900 MHz
Boost clock speed 1350 MHz vs 925 MHz
Texture fill rate 345.6 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 4096 vs 1024
Floating-point performance 11,059 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 71540 vs 70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13339 vs 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13339 vs 6316

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

  • Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 3.1x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1572 MHz
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3709
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3353
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3709
  • 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3353
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 4800 MHz vs 1572 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8390 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 27566 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8390 vs 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 27566 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
71540
70535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13339
6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13339
6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3709
8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
27566
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
PassMark - G3D Mark 12984
PassMark - G2D Mark 805
Geekbench - OpenCL 71540 70535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 142.691
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1729.558
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.693
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 111.376
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1396.172
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13339 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 27566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13339 6316
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709 8390
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 27566

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Vega 10 Pitcairn
Launch date 27 June 2017 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 227 165
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1350 MHz 925 MHz
Core clock speed 1250 MHz 900 MHz
Floating-point performance 11,059 gflops 1,894 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 4096 1024
Texture fill rate 345.6 GTexel / s 59.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt
Transistor count 12,500 million 2,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 402.4 GB / s 153.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1572 MHz 4800 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5