AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs AMD Radeon Pro 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X and AMD Radeon Pro 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1475 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 1956.5x more texture fill rate: 377.6 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13123 vs 10113
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13123 vs 10113
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2900
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2900
- Around 88% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75438 vs 40065
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 948 vs 943
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14631 vs 7753
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1475 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s vs 193.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 vs 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75438 vs 40065 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 948 vs 943 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14631 vs 7753 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 580
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.6x more memory clock speed: 6780 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6780 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 580
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | AMD Radeon Pro 580 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13123 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13123 | 10113 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2900 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3353 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 75438 | 40065 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 948 | 943 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14631 | 7753 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 109.521 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1206.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.88 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | AMD Radeon Pro 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Vega 10 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 23 June 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 172 | 311 |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1475 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 755.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 24.17 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.08 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 94.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 377.6 GTexel/s | 193.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 12500 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 6,175 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 241 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 256.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2048 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 6780 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |