AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1475 MHz
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 377.6 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 8192 vs 4096
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 16 GB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98389 vs 75438
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 13123
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 13123
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 14631
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 23 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1475 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 377.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 4096 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 16 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 vs 75438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 14631 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 475 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 948 vs 917
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3713 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 948 vs 917 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 | 75438 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 13123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 948 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 14631 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 23 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 159 | 174 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1475 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | 755.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | 24.17 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | 12.08 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 8192 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | 94.40 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 377.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 12500 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
Memory type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |