AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 2382.6x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2816
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 1612 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 11675
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 11675
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 818
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 9433
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 8192 vs 2816 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3350 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 818 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 9433 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 275 Watt vs 475 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3350 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 818 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 9433 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 114.288 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | Grenada |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 159 | 279 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | 44 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8192 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 512 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |