AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 2090.7x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 16 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 8 GB
- 201.5x more memory clock speed: 1612 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98389 vs 44905
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 13765
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 13765
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3691
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3340
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3340
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 603
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 10465
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 210.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 vs 44905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 vs 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 vs 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3340 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 603 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 10465 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 475 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 | 44905 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3340 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 603 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 10465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5530 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Pascal |
| Code name | Vega 20 | GP104B |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 160 | 312 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
| Price now | $359.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1920 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 8 GB/s |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
