AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1140 MHz
Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1335 MHz
3.4x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
5.3x more pipelines: 8192 vs 1536
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
10.7x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 6 GB
Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98389 vs 53834
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 12301
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 12301
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 364
Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 8622

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	Dec 2019 vs 23 April 2019
Core clock speed	1574 MHz vs 1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	1720 MHz vs 1335 MHz
Texture fill rate	440.3 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
Pipelines	8192 vs 1536
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	64 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed	1612 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	98389 vs 53834
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14208 vs 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14208 vs 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 3358
PassMark - G2D Mark	917 vs 364
PassMark - G3D Mark	15977 vs 8622

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

7.9x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 475 Watt

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 475 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3713

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

98389

53834

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14208

12301

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14208

12301

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3713

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3359

3358

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

917

364

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

15977

8622

Name	AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL	98389	53834
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14208	12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14208	12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3713	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3713	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359	3358
PassMark - G2D Mark	917	364
PassMark - G3D Mark	15977	8622
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		195.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1919.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		14.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		94.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		492.867
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		4912

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Turing
Code name	Vega 20	TU116
Launch date	Dec 2019	23 April 2019
Place in performance rating	160	333
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1720 MHz	1335 MHz
Compute units	64
Core clock speed	1574 MHz	1140 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	880.6 GFLOPS (1:16)	128.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	28.18 TFLOPS (2:1)	8.202 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	14.09 TFLOPS	4.101 TFLOPS
Pipelines	8192	1536
Pixel fill rate	110.1 GPixel/s	64.08 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	440.3 GTexel/s	128.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	475 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	13230 million	6600 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None
Width	Dual-slot
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	825.3 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	4096 bit	192 bit
Memory clock speed	1612 MHz	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)