AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 4.3x more pipelines: 8192 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 10.7x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98389 vs 59513
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 417
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 9789
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 6 January 2019 |
| Pipelines | 8192 vs 1920 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 vs 59513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 vs 417 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 vs 9789 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15485 vs 14208
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15485 vs 14208
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15485 vs 14208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15485 vs 14208 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98389 | 59513 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14208 | 15485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14208 | 15485 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3353 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 917 | 417 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15977 | 9789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 234.866 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2849.031 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.956 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 147.291 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 809.639 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5596 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Turing |
| Code name | Vega 20 | TU106 |
| Launch date | Dec 2019 | 6 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 160 | 248 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | |
| Compute units | 64 | |
| Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 8192 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 13230 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo with others
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon HD 7670A
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 580X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II Duo vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
