AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
  • 2.6x more core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
  • 3.6x more pipelines: 8192 vs 2304
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 10.7x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98389 vs 68305
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14208 vs 10140
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14208 vs 10140
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 917 vs 343
  • Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15977 vs 8366
Specifications (specs)
Launch date Dec 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed 1574 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1720 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s vs 175.0 GTexel/s
Pipelines 8192 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size 64 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 98389 vs 68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14208 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14208 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3351
PassMark - G2D Mark 917 vs 343
PassMark - G3D Mark 15977 vs 8366

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • 7.9x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 475 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 475 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
98389
68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14208
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14208
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3351
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
917
343
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15977
8366
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL 98389 68305
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14208 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14208 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3351
PassMark - G2D Mark 917 343
PassMark - G3D Mark 15977 8366
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 645.647

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.1 Turing
Code name Vega 20 TU106
Launch date Dec 2019 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 159 325
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1720 MHz 1215 MHz
Compute units 64
Core clock speed 1574 MHz 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 14.09 TFLOPS 5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines 8192 2304
Pixel fill rate 110.1 GPixel/s 77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s 175.0 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 475 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 13230 million 10800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width Dual-slot IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenCL 2.0 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 825.3 GB/s 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 4096 bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1612 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR6

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)