AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 64% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 960 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.1x more pipelines: 4096 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 540
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 11355
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 1920 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 540 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 vs 11355 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- 5.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 8.7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17150 vs 16149
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17150 vs 16149
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2813
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2813
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 vs 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 vs 16149 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 2813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 17150 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | 3358 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | 540 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 | 11355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5908 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Turing |
Code name | Vega 20 | TU106B |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 166 | 205 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 960 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |