AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 988 MHz
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 2058.4x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 12 GB
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99542 vs 37354
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 13738
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 13738
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 737
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 11792
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | Dec 2019 vs 21 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 12 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 vs 37354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 vs 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 vs 13738 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 vs 737 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 vs 11792 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 475 Watt
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1612 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3100
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3100
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2813
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2813
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 475 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3100 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2813 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2813 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99542 | 37354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16149 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16149 | 13738 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3100 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3100 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2813 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2813 | 3356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | 737 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15475 | 11792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.895 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 768.171 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Vega 20 | GM200 |
Launch date | Dec 2019 | 21 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 166 | 243 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,199.99 | |
Price now | $2,825 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1720 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Compute units | 64 | |
Core clock speed | 1574 MHz | 988 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 14.09 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4096 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 110.1 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 440.3 GTexel/s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 475 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13230 million | 8,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 850 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 825.3 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 4096 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1612 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |