AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 988 MHz
  • Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1114 MHz
  • 2058.4x more texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.7x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99542 vs 37354
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16149 vs 13738
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16149 vs 13738
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 768 vs 737
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15475 vs 11792
Specifications (specs)
Launch date Dec 2019 vs 21 March 2015
Core clock speed 1574 MHz vs 988 MHz
Boost clock speed 1720 MHz vs 1114 MHz
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
Pipelines 4096 vs 3072
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size 32 GB vs 12 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 99542 vs 37354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16149 vs 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16149 vs 13738
PassMark - G2D Mark 768 vs 737
PassMark - G3D Mark 15475 vs 11792

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

  • Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 475 Watt
  • 4.1x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1612 MHz
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3100
  • Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3100
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2813
  • Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2813
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt vs 475 Watt
Memory clock speed 6612 MHz vs 1612 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3100
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 2813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 2813

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
99542
37354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16149
13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16149
13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3100
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3100
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2813
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2813
3356
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
768
737
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
15475
11792
Name AMD Radeon Pro Vega II NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Geekbench - OpenCL 99542 37354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 16149 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 16149 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3100 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3100 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2813 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2813 3356
PassMark - G2D Mark 768 737
PassMark - G3D Mark 15475 11792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 768.171

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Essentials

Architecture GCN 5.1 Maxwell 2.0
Code name Vega 20 GM200
Launch date Dec 2019 21 March 2015
Place in performance rating 166 243
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $4,199.99
Price now $2,825
Value for money (0-100) 4.69

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1720 MHz 1114 MHz
Compute units 64
Core clock speed 1574 MHz 988 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 880.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 28.18 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 14.09 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4096 3072
Pixel fill rate 110.1 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 440.3 GTexel/s 213.9 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 475 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13230 million 8,000 million
Floating-point performance 6,844 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU) 850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 8-pin
Width Dual-slot
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 12 GB
Memory bandwidth 825.3 GB/s 317.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 4096 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1612 MHz 6612 MHz
Memory type HBM2 GDDR5

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)