AMD Radeon Pro Vega II vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro Vega II and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1574 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1720 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Around 98% higher texture fill rate: 440.3 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99542 vs 85526

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	Dec 2019 vs 13 November 2018
Core clock speed	1574 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed	1720 MHz vs 1545 MHz
Texture fill rate	440.3 GTexel/s vs 222.5 GTexel/s
Pipelines	4096 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Maximum memory size	32 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	99542 vs 85526

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

3x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 475 Watt
Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1612 MHz
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 16149
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 16149
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3100
Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3100
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2813
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2813

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	160 Watt vs 475 Watt
Memory clock speed	1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) vs 1612 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20206 vs 16149
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20206 vs 16149
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 vs 3100
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 vs 3100
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3359 vs 2813
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3359 vs 2813

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

99542

85526

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16149

20206

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

16149

20206

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3100

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3100

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2813

3359

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2813

3359

Name	AMD Radeon Pro Vega II	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL	99542	85526
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	16149	20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	16149	20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3100	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3100	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2813	3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2813	3359
PassMark - G2D Mark	768
PassMark - G3D Mark	15475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		282.628
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3403.106
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		24.719
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		136.919
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1010.818
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		7856

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon Pro Vega II	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 5.1	Turing
Code name	Vega 20	TU104
Launch date	Dec 2019	13 November 2018
Place in performance rating	166	195
Type	Laptop	Desktop
GCN generation		Quadro RTX
Launch price (MSRP)		$899
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1720 MHz	1545 MHz
Compute units	64
Core clock speed	1574 MHz	1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	880.6 GFLOPS (1:16)	222.5 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	28.18 TFLOPS (2:1)	14.24 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	14.09 TFLOPS	7.119 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4096	2304
Pixel fill rate	110.1 GPixel/s	98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	440.3 GTexel/s	222.5 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	475 Watt	160 Watt
Transistor count	13230 million	13600 million
Render output units		64
Texture Units		144
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 4x mini-DisplayPort	3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Recommended system power (PSU)	850 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Width	Dual-slot
Length		9.5 inches (241 mm)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.1
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	825.3 GB/s	416.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	4096 bit	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1612 MHz	1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Technologies
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)