AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD FirePro R5000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD FirePro R5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 3111.1x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 39.6 GTexel / s
- Around 83% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 25 February 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3342 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro R5000
- Around 83% higher memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3463
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD FirePro R5000
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD FirePro R5000 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3342 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 625 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2647 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD FirePro R5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 25 February 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $1,099 |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 402 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,267 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 279 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | Single-slot | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 102.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
