AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon R9 285
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon R9 285 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 918 MHz
- 1198.4x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 190 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 71.777
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1474.632
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 6.359
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 91.954
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 390.891
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 6474
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3463 vs 3043
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2782
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 6474
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3463 vs 3043
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2782
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 2 September 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 918 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 102.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 190 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 71.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 1474.632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 6.359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 91.954 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 390.891 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 vs 3043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 vs 3043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2782 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 285
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 285
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 71.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1474.632 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 6.359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 91.954 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 390.891 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 2782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 2782 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6680 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 597 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon R9 285 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Tonga |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 2 September 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $249 |
Place in performance rating | 330 | 448 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 918 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 102.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 190 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,290 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 221 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 176.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 5500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |