AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon R9 M470X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon R9 M470X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2000x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470X
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3463
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3244 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57109 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon R9 M470X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Strato |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 15 May 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 459 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Width | Single-slot | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
