AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1090 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 1833.3x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 67.2 GTexel / s
- Around 57% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 55.048
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 969.655
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 4.655
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 76.807
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 239.111
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 6821
- 105.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 115.4
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 8 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1090 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 55.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 969.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 4.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 76.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 239.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 115.4 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 7000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop)
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 55.048 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 969.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 4.655 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 76.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 239.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 6821 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 115.4 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4102 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 575 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17646 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1724 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | AMD Radeon RX 460 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Baffin |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 8 August 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $86 |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 551 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
| GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
| Price now | $179.50 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 33.86 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1090 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 67.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,000 million |
| Compute units | 14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2.2 TFLOPs | |
| GPU Power | 35-48 Watt | |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 170 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Width | Single-slot | |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 112 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 7000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
