AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 38% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 9780
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3463 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1982
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 9780
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3463 vs 2168
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1982
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 9780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 1982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 9780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 vs 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 1982 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 6.9x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 16 Mar 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 9780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 1982 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 9780 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 2168 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 1982 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6417 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39431 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3172 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | N18P-G62 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 16 Mar 2020 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 438 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Width | Single-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
