AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 1935.102
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 111.023
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 111.023 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 64% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1408
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 168.08 vs 130.7
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 vs 13.641
- Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1001.496 vs 774.974
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 vs 12184
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3463
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3355
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 vs 12184
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3463
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1408 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 vs 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 vs 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 vs 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 168.08 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 1935.102 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 22.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 111.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1001.496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8055 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11746 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 29 January 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 178 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1185 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
