AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 23 July 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1408
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 337.794 vs 130.7
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4566.815 vs 2361.73
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.631 vs 13.641
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 190.996 vs 135.462
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1654.321 vs 774.974
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27179 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3463
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27179 vs 12184
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3463
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1408 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 337.794 vs 130.7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4566.815 vs 2361.73 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.631 vs 13.641 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.996 vs 135.462 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1654.321 vs 774.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27179 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27179 vs 12184 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3463 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 337.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 4566.815 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 31.631 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 190.996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 1654.321 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 27179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 27179 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3355 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19612 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 117223 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 14 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 23 July 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $699 |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 109 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 3072 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | |
| CUDA cores | 3072 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Width | Single-slot | 2-Slot |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 496 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
