AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 405 MHz
- 7604.9x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 16.2 GTexel / s
- 4.4x more pipelines: 1408 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.6x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 1792 MB
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 27 July 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 405 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 16.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 320 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 1792 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 37% higher memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5249 vs 3463
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7205 vs 3355
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5249 vs 3463
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7205 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5249 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7205 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5249 vs 3463 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7205 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 5249 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 7205 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 5249 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 7205 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2060 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23008 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Navi 14 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 27 July 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Place in performance rating | 330 | 414 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 405 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 320 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 16.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,100 million |
| Floating-point performance | 518.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Width | Single-slot | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1792 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 2400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500 with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
ATIRadeon X1950 CrossFire Edition
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro W5500 vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
