AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- 2646x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1408 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 43.877
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 773.248
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 3.082
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 53.425
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 184.343
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12184 vs 3575
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12184 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 1 February 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 vs 3575 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 125 Watt
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3463
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3355
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3463
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 6631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 3881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 6631 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3621 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 563 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 14 | GP107 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 1 February 2018 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 330 | 575 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Price now | $176.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 46.56 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 40 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 145 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |