AMD Radeon Pro W5500 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500 and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1187 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 3826.1x more texture fill rate: 123.2 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- 3.1x more pipelines: 1408 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 90% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 238 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 3 GB
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 130.7 vs 26.055
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2361.73 vs 901.157
- 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.641 vs 2.99
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 135.462 vs 41.654
- 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 774.974 vs 89.869
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 448 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 238 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 vs 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 vs 901.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 vs 2.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 vs 41.654 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 vs 89.869 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3463
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3355
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3463
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 vs 3463 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 130.7 | 26.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2361.73 | 901.157 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.641 | 2.99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.462 | 41.654 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 774.974 | 89.869 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3463 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3463 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 9064 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3176 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 362 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11024 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500 | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Navi 14 | GF100 |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 25 July 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Place in performance rating | 330 | 576 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1187 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 246.4 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.885 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.942 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 448 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 123.2 GTexel/s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 238 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 248 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | Single-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 144.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |