AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs AMD Radeon R9 270X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and AMD Radeon R9 270X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 1519x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 84 GTexel / s
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 8068
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 8068
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 84 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 vs 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 vs 8068 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 8068 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 8068 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4890 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 611 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.455 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1314.545 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.339 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.21 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 315.366 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1771 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon R9 270X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Curacao |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 400 | 441 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
| Price now | $399 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 84 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,688 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2 x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5500
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro S7000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
