AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs AMD Radeon R9 280
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and AMD Radeon R9 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 933 MHz
- 1221.1x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3337
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3337
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 7957
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 7957
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 4 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 933 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 vs 7957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 vs 7957 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280
- Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1408 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 7957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 7957 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5562 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.909 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 365.384 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2009 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon R9 280 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Navi 14 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 4 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 423 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 933 MHz |
Compute units | 22 | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1408 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 104.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 6400 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,344 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |