AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs AMD Radeon R9 280

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and AMD Radeon R9 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 55% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 933 MHz
  • 1221.1x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 200 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3337
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3337
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 7957
  • Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 7957
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 vs 4 March 2014
Boost clock speed 1450 MHz vs 933 MHz
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 200 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9943 vs 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9943 vs 7957

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280

  • Around 27% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1408
Pipelines 1792 vs 1408

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9943
7957
Name AMD Radeon Pro W5500M AMD Radeon R9 280
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9943 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9943 7957
Geekbench - OpenCL 45724
PassMark - G3D Mark 5562
PassMark - G2D Mark 665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1266.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.909
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 365.384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2009

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M AMD Radeon R9 280

Essentials

Architecture RDNA 1.0 GCN 1.0
Code name Navi 14 Tahiti
Launch date 10 Feb 2020 4 March 2014
Place in performance rating 400 423
Type Laptop Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $279

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1450 MHz 933 MHz
Compute units 22
Core clock speed 1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 7 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 4.083 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1408 1792
Pixel fill rate 46.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 127.6 GTexel/s 104.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 6400 million 4,313 million
Floating-point performance 3,344 gflops
Stream Processors 1792

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 4.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Length 275 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 192.0 GB/s 240 GB/s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)