AMD Radeon Pro W5500M vs AMD Radeon Sky 500
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500M and AMD Radeon Sky 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 950 MHz
- 1678.9x more texture fill rate: 127.6 GTexel/s vs 76 GTexel / s
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 76% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2116
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2116
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9943 vs 3585
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9943 vs 3585
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 vs 27 March 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 950 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s vs 76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1408 vs 1280 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 vs 3585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 vs 3585 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 500
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4800 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 vs 3356
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 vs 3356
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74902 vs 45724
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5116 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5116 vs 3356 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74902 vs 45724 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 500
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon Sky 500 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 2116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 2116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 5116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 5116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9943 | 3585 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9943 | 3585 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 45724 | 74902 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4764 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.669 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1096.68 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.352 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 247.642 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500M | AMD Radeon Sky 500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Navi 14 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 10 Feb 2020 | 27 March 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 400 | 510 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 255.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.166 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.083 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1408 | 1280 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 127.6 GTexel/s | 76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 6400 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 242 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 154 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500M with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 5500
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro S7000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDFirePro R5000
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100 Mobile
